We know (or think we do) how man came to the Americas and
settled here long before any Vikings or Englishmen. But how did we come to
think of it? After all, the idea of a giant land/ice bridge existing randomly
and having tribes of people follow bison over it, then having the bridge close
off behind them is slightly fantastic when you first look at it. So, what made
us think what we think now, and what did we think of originally?
The second that Columbus found out that the people he met were,
in fact, not from the East Indies, speculation begun about their true origin.
At first, it was even theorized that they weren’t even human, because they
weren’t mentioned in the Bible at all. Luckily, the Pope of the time officially
stated that they were in fact human and came from the fabled couple of Adam and
Eve. But that raised the question of where did these random humans actually
come from?
Of course, there were (and still are) tons of theories. Some
were still biblical, arguing that they could be one of the lost “Tribes of
Israel”, or they were placed there by the devil himself to change the ways of
decent Christian folk. It was also said they could be migrants of the Trojans,
Romans, Ethiopians, English, Danes, Greeks, Phoenicians, Egyptians, French,
Welsh, or even the one of the lost civilizations such as Atlantis.
However, some of the more scientific minds began reaching
the right result. Arguing that by the Indians simply had migrated from Asia to
America by ship, the semi-factually sound idea began catching enthusiasm as
more and more people began agreeing that it was an after ice-age migration by
boat. It got to the point where anyone who thought otherwise was shunned by all
who were in the idea’s community, because the scientific evidence obviously
agrees with them, not the outliers. And they were right; no real evidence had
come up saying that they were wrong. Until it did. So, what was this grand
piece of evidence that gave us the idea we have today? Well, it started with
some lost cows.
George McJunkin, a
New Mexico cowboy, isn’t a common name when the archaeology of America is
discussed. But we’ve got him to thank, because without him and some cattle, we
may still be thinking that the Indians came over by boat. In 1926, some cows
had managed to wander off, and he was riding a horse down a (arroyo) when he
spotted some bones 20 under the top of the cliff face. Of course, he abandoned the quest for the
cattle for the moment and took a closer look at these bleached bones.
Luckily, he was sharp-eyed and he recognized that the bones
were similar to cattle bones, but huge. He also found some arrow points mixed
in when he dug a bit with his knife. After managing to find the cows and
getting them back to the ranch, he talked about his weird discovery with
neighbors and friends, and somehow word got to J.D. Figgins, a director at the
Colorado Museum of Natural History.
Figgins got his hands on some of the bones, and recognized them as
bison, and a type of bison that was only alive during the first ice-age.
However, the bones were mixed in with arrowheads, and by the prevailing theory
that man came after the ice-ages, that should be impossible.
But the find was proved to be true. And with that, the
theory that man came after the ice-ages began to slowly tumble down. Small
evidence that somewhat contradicted the main theory but had been swept under
the rug came back up. Archaeologists who were afraid of being drummed out of
the community began talking about their own findings now that a huge find had been
found against the main theory.
And we began discovering the real way that the Native
Americans managed to make it here, by land bridge. An otherwise fantastic theory replaced the
sensible “by boats” theory, due to the sudden extreme amount of evidence. And
at the time of this writing, no seriously proven evidence has been brought up
against the current prevailing theory.
No comments:
Post a Comment