Pluto may have a hidden liquid ocean underneath the icy crust. Most likely made up of Ammonia, the ocean was made when another planet hit it, this would explain the slight bulge that keeps it aligned with the Sputnik Planitia. Radioactive heat from the core of Pluto combined with the natural properties of Ammonia keeps this underground ocean liquid. The idea came from cross refrencing telescopes (ground based) and Nasa's New Horizons spacecraft.
This blog brought to you by Adventure Van.
Saturday, December 3, 2016
Saturday, November 19, 2016
How to create a Science Fair Project
Heya, it's Adventure Van with yet another blog post. I'm here to tell you how to make a repor- wait, I did that already. Well, what about something to create a report about? Haven't done that? Okay then, this will be about how to create a Science Fair Project.
Well, the first thing you have to do is pick out a thing and write about it- it's more complicated then that? Actually, you need to find a topic, something you're INTERESTED in. Then, you have to narrow it down to a subject, something DOABLE. As much as doing a report in the growing patterns about 20 separate trees sounds cool, you're going to want a project you can finish in 1-2 months.
After doing that, you'll have created the question, which you'll be making your report on. You're also going to do some RESEARCH (that has a habit of showing up) about what you're reporting on. This is not your test, it's already done research and knowledge. Then, you'll have to create a HYPOTHESIS, which is what YOU expect to happen. Then you'll just test it and write down what happened, and done! Wait, I'm forgetting something. Whoops.
See, you kinda need to create a TEST, or a project, to, well, test your hypothesis. Here's some key things to remember doing a report:
Well, writing isn't as fun as doing, but it's great to show off your project. Have another list to show you what I mean.
Well, that's done. See you mates.
Adventure Van, out.
Well, the first thing you have to do is pick out a thing and write about it- it's more complicated then that? Actually, you need to find a topic, something you're INTERESTED in. Then, you have to narrow it down to a subject, something DOABLE. As much as doing a report in the growing patterns about 20 separate trees sounds cool, you're going to want a project you can finish in 1-2 months.
After doing that, you'll have created the question, which you'll be making your report on. You're also going to do some RESEARCH (that has a habit of showing up) about what you're reporting on. This is not your test, it's already done research and knowledge. Then, you'll have to create a HYPOTHESIS, which is what YOU expect to happen. Then you'll just test it and write down what happened, and done! Wait, I'm forgetting something. Whoops.
See, you kinda need to create a TEST, or a project, to, well, test your hypothesis. Here's some key things to remember doing a report:
- It's not to long or hard. Having it be either will put a drain on you, and you may not finish whatsoever.
- There's only ONE independent. A independent is something like sunlight, a human/pet's willingness to help, and other things you can't control.
- You have a steady control. A control is something like a flower with no fertilizer whatsoever in a fertilizer experiment. It's something to show what would happen with nothing.
Well, writing isn't as fun as doing, but it's great to show off your project. Have another list to show you what I mean.
- Title Page, for your name, the project's name, and any other important itemry.
- For a stapled project, a Table of Contents might come in handy.
- An Abstract is nice for condensing your project. Just write down a brief overview of your HYPOTHESIS and RESULTS.
- An Introductory Paragraph can help with showing why you chose this topic, as well as putting in some interesting RESEARCH you found.
- A list of Materials is good for people cross-referencing your project.
- Putting down what you did for your TEST is good.
- All the data. Whether or not it's in a graph form or not, people should see everything, not just what supports your HYPOTHESIS.
- A Conclusion to show what you think of the results should be seen.
- A Bibliography for showing websites and books you used on your quest.
- An Acknowledgments page, for all those nice people who helped you work on it or brew coffee the night before.
Well, that's done. See you mates.
Adventure Van, out.
Friday, October 21, 2016
How often do you go outside?
Adventure Van here, with a sad discovery. Apparently, 'Modern' kids are only spending less then a hour of time a WEEK playing outside without using their phone. It's quite disturbing, because that means children are spending less and less time out in the wilderness, won't care about it at much, and won't notice when it gets destroyed. I get out often, but I also spend a large amount of time inside on the computer. Since finding this out, I've decided to go and try to spend thirty minutes outside a day just playing, for health reasons and for gaining good experiences with the wilderness so I can care about what's happening to it. I'd recommend everyone else to go outside to a park and just relax, no matter how old you are. Even if you're too busy to go outside everyday, try once a week. Anything to make sure that you're going to care if some parking lot was going to be put in it.
This is Adventure Van, and I'm going outside. Feel free to join me.
This is Adventure Van, and I'm going outside. Feel free to join me.
Skyzone Q.P.
Heya! Adventure Van here, and I'm going to be talking about Sky Zone trampoline park. It's an awesome place, with several separate activities. As a member of a 2 hour a month group, I'll go and tell you some stuff about how awesome it is and why you should go. Sky Zone has an open bounce which is just 150 separate pads right next to each other so you can bounce from one to another, and bounce off the ones on the wall. (They haven't added the one's on the ceiling yet, wah.)
But there is also some mini-game like ones. There's a Sky Slam area, where you can attempt to shoot a hoop (hard) on top of a bouncing trampoline (very hard). And, of course, there's a game of TRAMPOLINE DODGEBALL. Which is pure awesomeness for any age. They also have a box pit, which has small foam boxes in a pit on one side of a trampoline. You jump on the trampoline, do a flip and land (feet first) into the pit. (Or you just throw the boxes at each other and make forts.)
Adventure Van, out.
But there is also some mini-game like ones. There's a Sky Slam area, where you can attempt to shoot a hoop (hard) on top of a bouncing trampoline (very hard). And, of course, there's a game of TRAMPOLINE DODGEBALL. Which is pure awesomeness for any age. They also have a box pit, which has small foam boxes in a pit on one side of a trampoline. You jump on the trampoline, do a flip and land (feet first) into the pit. (Or you just throw the boxes at each other and make forts.)
Adventure Van, out.
The Myth of the Lost Cause: Book Report
Hey guys, it's Adventure Van here with yet another blog post! Today I'm
going to be blogging about history, and how winners not always write it. For
those in the U.S., we all know The Civil War. What you don't know is that
history was manipulated at several points. It's all bound together to make the
South look amazing and the Union look like drooling idjits. I based my blog off of The Myth of the Lost Cause, by Edward H. Bonekemper III. In this blog, I'll
be refuting 7 separate points, so brace yourself!
POINT NO.1: Slavery was already dying at the time of the war. The truth is, A. Slavery is not benevolent. B. Slavery was not dying. In fact, Slavery was becoming more profitable. The amount of cheap labour expanded the South to a point where it got to the point that according to Lois Horton, "on the eve of the Civil War,(the worth of slaves) was greater than the total dollar value of all the U.S. banks." Also, a large amount of Southern economy depended on slaves, to the point they made up 2/3 the Southern work force. The chance of something so profitable and needed disappearing was slim.
POINT NO.2: States Rights was the reason of secession, not Slavery! Wrong. Before Lincoln's Inaguration, all the states that that seceded had slaves making up around %40 of their population. South Carolina topped everyone else with a whopping %57, proving that states with a high intrest in slavery seceded, not one interested in States Rights. Also, if that doesn't convince you, here's the truth: (From the Convention's Declaration) "We must either submit to degradation, and to the loss of property (Slaves) wourth four billions of money, or we must secede from the Union framed by our fathers, to secure this as well as every other species of property." This means A: Slavery WAS a main reason of secession, and B: Slaves were compared to livestock.
POINT NO.3 The South had no chance of winning! Nope. In fact, the South had a great chance of winning, because they didn't have to. All they needed was a tie, and they'd stay seceded. If it wasn't for General. Lee's aggressiveness and wastefulness of troops, (more of that next paragraph), the South would have at least hit a tie. Meanwhile, the Union had to barrage the south with attacks in order to conquer all the states or get them to surrender. The Union's chances of winning were actually smaller at the beginning of the war then the South's, and if it wasn't for bad ideas from Lee and subordinates, and smarts from Grant and his men, the South would definitely have stayed seceded.
POINT NO.4 Robert E. Lee is one of the greatest generals in history. Not true. Lee, was, in fact, a horrible general guilty of over aggressiveness, loss of battlefield control, one theater myopia, inadequate staff, complex and uncoordinated battle plans, poor orders, and senseless continuation of the war. He was duly critiqued until his death, where some people began ‘Sainting’ him, going so far to say that he “bathed in the white light that falls directly upon him with the smile of an approving … God.”
POINT NO.5: James Longstreet lost the war by not following Lee’s orders at Gettysberg. Ok, so I’m going to say that it’s wrong that the myth has both ‘The South Had No Chance of Winning’ and then say that Longstreet lost the war at Gettysberg, because it says that there was a chance UNTIL Gettysberg. But, there was one problem with the fabled ‘Dawn Order’ that Longstreet disobeyed. It’s this: There is no record that such a order ever happened. Lee himself said he didn’t give one, all orders on paper never talked about such an attack, and no one in or nearby Lee heard anything about a ‘Dawn Attack’.
POINT NO.6: Ulysses S. Grant was a butcher who won simply by brute force and superior numbers. See, if you have the courageous, brave South who were fighting for State’s Rights, and the undefeatable Lee, you’ve got to have a reason they lost. That reason is that Grant was a butcher who didn’t care for typical things like strategy and diplomacy, and only won by sending man after man to his doom. However, looking at the casualty rates, you’ll see that Lee’s army suffered 190,760 casualties, while Grant’s suffered 153,642. Quite remarkable, seeing how Grant was on the offensive and had a larger army, and Lee was on the defense and had more fortifications and supplies.
POINT NO.7: The North won by waging TOTAL WAR! Total war is where you destroy crops, kill people, and totally ruin the other side’s day. Of course, Grant ‘the Butcher’ was ok with this, while Lee’s army would always pay for what they took, and wouldn’t enter a house without authority. Except that Grant would have soldiers who did this court marshaled, and Lee’s army would pay using the ‘Confederate’ dollar, which was worthless. But you didn’t refuse it to a group of soldiers who had loaded guns. So, in all reality, TOTAL WAR was not waged on either side, and Grant was NOT ok with murder and pillaging and all that fun stuff, and Lee’s army wouldn’t always abide by Lee’s rules themselves.
And that’s that! Adventure Van hopes you had fun reading this, and if you have a problem, just comment below!
Adventure Van, out.
POINT NO.1: Slavery was already dying at the time of the war. The truth is, A. Slavery is not benevolent. B. Slavery was not dying. In fact, Slavery was becoming more profitable. The amount of cheap labour expanded the South to a point where it got to the point that according to Lois Horton, "on the eve of the Civil War,(the worth of slaves) was greater than the total dollar value of all the U.S. banks." Also, a large amount of Southern economy depended on slaves, to the point they made up 2/3 the Southern work force. The chance of something so profitable and needed disappearing was slim.
POINT NO.2: States Rights was the reason of secession, not Slavery! Wrong. Before Lincoln's Inaguration, all the states that that seceded had slaves making up around %40 of their population. South Carolina topped everyone else with a whopping %57, proving that states with a high intrest in slavery seceded, not one interested in States Rights. Also, if that doesn't convince you, here's the truth: (From the Convention's Declaration) "We must either submit to degradation, and to the loss of property (Slaves) wourth four billions of money, or we must secede from the Union framed by our fathers, to secure this as well as every other species of property." This means A: Slavery WAS a main reason of secession, and B: Slaves were compared to livestock.
POINT NO.3 The South had no chance of winning! Nope. In fact, the South had a great chance of winning, because they didn't have to. All they needed was a tie, and they'd stay seceded. If it wasn't for General. Lee's aggressiveness and wastefulness of troops, (more of that next paragraph), the South would have at least hit a tie. Meanwhile, the Union had to barrage the south with attacks in order to conquer all the states or get them to surrender. The Union's chances of winning were actually smaller at the beginning of the war then the South's, and if it wasn't for bad ideas from Lee and subordinates, and smarts from Grant and his men, the South would definitely have stayed seceded.
POINT NO.4 Robert E. Lee is one of the greatest generals in history. Not true. Lee, was, in fact, a horrible general guilty of over aggressiveness, loss of battlefield control, one theater myopia, inadequate staff, complex and uncoordinated battle plans, poor orders, and senseless continuation of the war. He was duly critiqued until his death, where some people began ‘Sainting’ him, going so far to say that he “bathed in the white light that falls directly upon him with the smile of an approving … God.”
POINT NO.5: James Longstreet lost the war by not following Lee’s orders at Gettysberg. Ok, so I’m going to say that it’s wrong that the myth has both ‘The South Had No Chance of Winning’ and then say that Longstreet lost the war at Gettysberg, because it says that there was a chance UNTIL Gettysberg. But, there was one problem with the fabled ‘Dawn Order’ that Longstreet disobeyed. It’s this: There is no record that such a order ever happened. Lee himself said he didn’t give one, all orders on paper never talked about such an attack, and no one in or nearby Lee heard anything about a ‘Dawn Attack’.
POINT NO.6: Ulysses S. Grant was a butcher who won simply by brute force and superior numbers. See, if you have the courageous, brave South who were fighting for State’s Rights, and the undefeatable Lee, you’ve got to have a reason they lost. That reason is that Grant was a butcher who didn’t care for typical things like strategy and diplomacy, and only won by sending man after man to his doom. However, looking at the casualty rates, you’ll see that Lee’s army suffered 190,760 casualties, while Grant’s suffered 153,642. Quite remarkable, seeing how Grant was on the offensive and had a larger army, and Lee was on the defense and had more fortifications and supplies.
POINT NO.7: The North won by waging TOTAL WAR! Total war is where you destroy crops, kill people, and totally ruin the other side’s day. Of course, Grant ‘the Butcher’ was ok with this, while Lee’s army would always pay for what they took, and wouldn’t enter a house without authority. Except that Grant would have soldiers who did this court marshaled, and Lee’s army would pay using the ‘Confederate’ dollar, which was worthless. But you didn’t refuse it to a group of soldiers who had loaded guns. So, in all reality, TOTAL WAR was not waged on either side, and Grant was NOT ok with murder and pillaging and all that fun stuff, and Lee’s army wouldn’t always abide by Lee’s rules themselves.
And that’s that! Adventure Van hopes you had fun reading this, and if you have a problem, just comment below!
Adventure Van, out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)